Visiting Mt. Rainier

By Jay Satz
From his December 21, 2006 visit to Mt. Rainier

road washed out

Over a two day period in early November 2006, Washington State’s iconic Mt. Rainier National Park received up to 18 inches of rainfall, which in any other November would more likely have fallen as three or four feet of snow. The resulting cascades of water from the rain and melted snow and ice from Rainier’s glaciated peak created some of the worst flooding in the mountain’s history as a national park. Since those couple of extraordinary days, in an unprecedented situation, the park has been completely closed to the public.

When I met with the park’s superintendent, Dave Uberuaga, and his senior staff six weeks after the event, I was wondering what I would see. Powerful photographs published during and soon after the storm showed massive walls of water moving down the Nisqually River, carrying huge boulders and massive 800-year and older trees. Rivers changed channels, leaving campgrounds, bridges and roads washed completely away. The emergency helipad was gone and the river flowed into Longmire, the national historic landmark settlement that houses park headquarters, and home to the families of park staff, including children cut off from their school. Buildings were undermined and utilities, sewage, and drinking water were all disrupted, with electricity unavailable for six weeks despite an aggressive restoration effort by park staff and federal highway workers.

On December 14, the week before I drove down to the park, another extraordinary storm swept through the Pacific Northwest, with 90 mph winds sweeping away trees, homes, bridges and leaving almost one million people in and around Seattle without electricity. The November damage to Mt. Rainier (recently estimated at $36 million) and sister national parks Olympic and North Cascades was blown off the headlines and from the minds of most Northwesterners as 15 local citizens lost their lives to the second storm, including one woman in Seattle, drowning in her basement as flash flooding overtook the municipal sewer system’s capacity to manage the volume and velocity of water.

Dave Uberuaga and I had been trading phone calls and emails since the worse of it but the 18-hour days he and his staff had been solidly putting in since Election Day had made meeting earlier impossible. Now we were getting together to see how SCA could be of assistance in repairing the damage.

After a substantive meeting which laid the groundwork for a significant recovery partnership between the park and SCA, Dave drove me into the park. We bypassed the closure of the elegant arched entry of the Nisqually gate, not closed to the public since Mt. St. Helens massive eruption in 1980. We went in the “back way,” over a bridge spanning the Nisqually River narrowly saved through dozers moving massive amounts of river rock, and eventually through a locked gate that crept up on the backside of a closed campground opposite Longmire. I had never entered the park this way and when I queried Dave as to why we were going in the back way he patiently explained, “because we don’t have a road anymore, Jay.”

We had the back road (as it was – it was barely adequate for a single vehicle in some places, and already snow packed for the season) to ourselves, so Dave stopped often to point out the most severe damage (see the photos elsewhere on SCA’s website!). Emergency operations center and helipad – gone, swallowed completely by the river. Sunshine Point campground was gone as well, including a critical 50 yards of roadway that effectively separated the park’s entrance station from Longmire. Utility conduit, culverts, bridges gone. Huge trees and massive amounts of debris scattered along both banks, and both banks under scoured and eroded beyond my more informed than most expectation of the damage.

Perhaps the most visually impactful scene for me occurred as we approached Longmire from the east side of the river. The channel was ten times wider than I remembered from my last visit several winters ago. The beautiful log built Longmire community center behind me had thankfully not been damaged, but the road in front of it had partially been washed away, along with a swatch of beautiful old trees that had framed a gorgeous view of the Mountain from the wide wooden porch. Thousands of tons of river rock had been moved to shore up the road and river bank, and two very large earth moving machines with huge backhoe buckets were still maneuvering in the river bed, moving rock with clangs and bangs so loud that their sound was more dominant than the roar of the river.

Dave’s presence in the park was obviously appreciated by every park employee we met. He was very knowledgeable about every project we encountered and clued in to how much each employee had been working and what the impact of the situation was having on each person and in many cases, their families. It was also clear that Dave was making significant and often challenging resource management – and political – decisions regarding the future of the park on a daily (versus the hourly decisions of the first weeks) basis.

The progress of some repairs was really extraordinary, including the replacement of the road bed next to the Sunshine Point campground, though it is currently not expected that the public will have access to Longmire until very late winter or early spring. As for Paradise – site of the renowned Paradise Inn, the main park visitor center, the major winter recreation area and the key jumping off point for ascending the mountain – the road is so significantly damaged or the suspected weaknesses in the road bed is so severe, that it will not likely be open before summer is full on.

Thinking about the immense amount of snow covering all of the mountain now – it looks as if the Cascades are in for another 100% or better snow pack this year – brings with it the realization that all of the damage that occurred to high country hiking trails, bridges, and backcountry campsites has not been catalogued in any way. It is clear that this damage will be significant. In addition to the obvious damage to existing trails and structures will be the erosion scars from the immense run off – scars that will further undermine the stability of the soils and vegetation, and yet another opportunity for non-native plant species to invade and intrude into the delicate alpine ecosystem.

As Dave began the circle back on the main park road – still damaged and in some places dangerous, but just opened for official traffic a few days before – the damage from the mid-December wind storms became evident. Several 800-to-900-year-old fir and cedar trees had cracked and splintered into the forest along the road, or in two cases, onto the road itself (Dave and NPS employees in another vehicle approaching from the opposite direction witnessed the second crash as it occurred days earlier). Other trees of equal grandeur and age were wholly blown over, exposing immense 40+ foot diameter root wads that towered over the road.

Surveying the damage with me only seemed to emphasize Dave’s optimism about getting the park open to the public, but at the same time it was a sobering enough recognition of the resources that this job would take. Even though wide-eyed and awestruck by the impressive display of damage I was seeing, I could not help also feeling pride that Dave was calling on SCA to help the park with the extensive restoration he was imagining, and to provide leadership for the many other non-governmental groups and individuals offering their support.

I’ve been chewing on this

I’ve been chewing on this very same question, myself. As a former trail worker in the Adirondack Mountains of New York, I toiled constantly to minimize the effects of excessive human traffic on the land. People will continue to visit these areas. And they should. People should also respect the land they tread on, and mend what they have wounded. This respect cannot grow from pretty pictures in books. This respect has to be cultivated on-site, in the very forests, deserts, and rivers we fight to protect. The urgency of this Rainier project is not to re-build roads and cabins for the sake of human convenience. We need to re-build these roads, cabins, and trails so we can continue to experience these majestic areas, and teach as many people as possible about them. We could step back and let nature consume all traces of human interference, and let only the most rugged men and women venture into this new wilderness. Then how would we teach the importance of conservation, and instill a love for our earth to those who are not built like Ed Viesturs? If human negligence did help cause this disaster, through increased roads or deforestation, then we are obligated to assist in the recovery efforts. More and more people on this earth result in more and more consumption of resources, more pollution, and more of a disconnect from nature. We need to keep these areas accessible, while minimizing our burden on the land. Education is essential for effective conservation.

Gary and Corey: You both make

Gary and Corey: You both make very good points and ask a great question that should remain at the heart of any dialogue regarding how people manage wild places in both the national park system and in other natural areas in this country and through out the world. When I said that the impact of the great rains and flooding created the worst impact in the history of this area I was careful to say in “it’s history as a national park”, which was created in 1899. There were of course far greater glacial events, volcanic events, wind events, flooding events and plate tectonics that created the extraordinary landscape we treasure now. For those of us that call the Northwest home, these realities of the power of nature were drilled into our psyche with the eruptions of Mt. St. Helens in 1980 and since. At Mount Rainier National Park, “recovering” from these latest events bring to fore many competing challenges. For example, the roads, particularly the road from the Nisqually entrance station up through Longmire and to Paradise, are not only a means of access to the interior of the park; they are also historic landmarks and byways, designed by the first director of the park service, Stephen Mather. In fact, there is little land in the park that is not either designated wilderness (97%) or protected by national historic landmark status (over 2%), which includes most of the facilities at Longmire as well. Another challenge is the very schizophrenia of the park service mandate under the Organic Act of 1916, the congressional law that established the park service itself. Under the organic Act NPS is required to “conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects and the wild life therein and to provide for the enjoyment of same in such manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations”. These two fundamental tasks can be hard to achieve in the sight of the other. It could be argued (and it sounds like it was initially by some of the park staff) that the road’s destruction offered a remarkable opportunity for natural healing of the land, to reduce use or overuse by the public and as an extraordinary educational recognition of the immense power of nature. This is not too dissimilar from an argument Liz Putnam read from Bernard DeVoto in the early 50’s that the army needed to be put around the national parks to prevent them from being “loved to death”. Liz loved national parks dearly, but instead challenged the notion of closing off the parks and proposed the power of student conservationists to help heal the land. Land managers and land management policy continue to evolve. Mount Rainier used to have powered alpine ski lifts and a golf course at Paradise. Those are gone. Repairing roads and bridges and facilities to protect and educate the public are deemed essential by senior management staff that recognize that the public needs access to our parks in order to care for, and thus advocate for them. The public in this case is not just the “hard core” well experienced wilderness users, but the sometimes not yet initiated park user coming from the almost two million Washington citizens (many of them urban) living within a two hour drive from one of Mount Rainier’s entrances. As for SCA’s work, which will be repairing trails and building bridges, restoring soil and native vegetation to either flood scoured or earth moving machine scoured river and stream banks, clearing camp grounds and building picnic tables and other structures, and educating the public to the natural events that took place during the storms – this is all essential to protecting the resource. SCA’s renowned trail building and maintenance manual Lightly on the Land suggests that trails are pathways that could be considered 100% impact zones. These sacrifice zones of destruction as it were protect the natural landscape and features on both sides by concentrating the flow of human, horse, water and other trail users in one place. To allow access to the trails and backcountry of the park without providing bridges and trails would only do further damage to the unique ecosystem of ancient forests, alpine meadows and glacial fed rivers and streams. I certainly agree that there are times when “fixing nature” not only makes little sense, but can be antithetical to the very idea of supporting and celebrating the natural world. However in the case of the recent natural events at Mount Rainier, I find myself strongly aligned with Superintendent Uberuaga’s commitment to make sure the public has continued access to the park, and that this access provides as much protection to both the visitor and the natural resource they are coming to admire.

Jay - great article, thanks

Jay - great article, thanks for compiling your thoughts and perspective. The one area I would have liked you to confront and expound upon, however, is the dichotomous tension you must have felt during your visit between interpretting what you witnessed as a natural occurance affecting a (relatively unaltered) natural landscape, versus interpreting the “devastated” Rainier landscape from a more humanistic perspective (i.e. the impact on the human imprint –roads, bridges, infrastructure, etc.) More often than not, in human-altered landscapes the root of this type of (flooding) devastation can be traced back to the human-altered landscape itself (increase in impervious surfaces, ground destabilization due to land clearing, logging, development, etc.). In Rainier, I would presume that this was not so much the case. The alteration of the landscape you witnessed was due primarily to the tremendous volume of water which inundated the Park in a relatively short amount of time; a natural phenomenon. With this in mind I’m still left wondering and questioning whether, sans a human imprint in this majestic, rugged and highly-evolved natural landsape, the heavy rains and ensuing, landscape altering run-off should be interpreted more as natural (ecosystem) evolution than unprecedented devastation?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 11 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.